Saturday, October 21, 2017

Ayre K-5xeMP direct input selection using hidden remote codes

The original remote of Ayre K-5xeMP doesn't allow direct selection of the input source.  It turned out that the amplifier is capable of that via IR control, but the remote lacks keys for that.  This amplifier uses the standard RC-5 format with the device code of 16.  I found the following codes that the original remote doesn't have keys for:

56/mute off (not toggle)
57/mute on (not toggle)

These codes can be set to any JP1 programmable remote and let your favorite remote learn from it.

Although I don't have a way to confirm this, these codes may work on KX-5 and KX-R which also seem to lack direct input selection with the original remote.

Tuesday, July 4, 2017

Krell KAV-400xi and B&W 803D3 loaded and unloaded frequency response

Out of curiosity, I tried measuring the frequency response of my Krell KAV-400xi loaded/unloaded with B&W 803D3 to get some sense of its output impedance relative to the speaker's impedance over frequencies.

The following plots show voltage measured at the speaker end of the cable in unloaded/loaded conditions.  Since the speaker has separate binding posts for HF and LF, I could also take partially loaded measurements.  Fluke 187, which claims to have bandwidth of 100 kHz for AC RMS, was used for measurements.  I do not have fancy equipment.  Since the amplitude is very small to compared with the amp's full scale, I believe distortion components are negligible and do not contribute to RMS values.

When unloaded (blue curve), the amplifier shows a fairly flat frequency response.  The high-frequency roll off may belong to the multimeter or the source (not sure).  However, once loaded with the speaker, what a roller coaster ride!  Over frequencies the amplitude swings by about 1 dB.  1 dB of amplitude difference is clearly audible.

The conclusion I can draw here is that the output impedance of the amplifier is somewhat comparable to that of the speaker.  To see which one is changing so much over frequencies, I need to repeat the same measurement with a dummy load whose impedance doesn't change over the frequencies of interest.  It would be also of interest to repeat the measurements with a fancy amp, but I currently do not own one.

Also, I tried measuring at the amp and speaker end to see if there is any measurable difference.  The speaker cable used here is Canare 4S11 in biwire configuration.   The LF side was measured on the speaker side.

Some drop over the cable is visible.  I performed the measurements on both L & R channels and saw very similar responses.

To be continued with a dummy load...
Review of the amplifier by Stereophile (Fig. 1) shows that the output amplitudes at 8 ohm and 4 ohm loads are fairly uniformly apart by 0.25 dB up to around 10 kHz.  This implies that the output impedance is real (as opposed to complex) and about 0.24 Ohm (which means damping factor of 33 w.r.t. 8 Ohms).  If the speaker impedance was also real, I would be able to compute the speaker impedance, but it is usually it is very complex.  Interestingly, impedance measurement of 802D3 (Fig. 1) (not 803D3) shows that the speaker impedance bottoms between 100 Hz and 1 kHz and peaks at 3 kHz.  That trend is pretty well agreeing with my measurement of the 803D3.

I believe the impedance roughness is the reason why people say it's not easy to drive B&W 800 series.  If gain flatness measured at the speaker's binding post is what's important, low impedance has to be maintained over frequencies including the cable.  This calls for a lot of feedback, beefy output stage, class D, or some technique I am not aware of.  I am interested to know whether B&W designed the speaker assuming an ideal amplifier with no loading effect or used some kind of average amplifier model for tuning.